This statistical data is interesting, but upon closer inspection, the scope is actually quite limited. Only the data from DEXs is included, and the trading volumes of some major centralized exchanges are not part of the statistics at all. If that data were also included, the conclusion might need to be revised. This kind of selective statistics is quite intriguing; data really doesn't lie, and it's not just empty talk.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketBardvip
· 7h ago
Data can tell a story with just a few points; the volume of CEXs isn't fully accounted for, making DEXs seem very competitive. But the real situation? Hehe
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942vip
· 7h ago
The data selection is too biased, missing out on CEX is really a bit outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 7h ago
Haha, it's the same old story. I'm already used to cherry-picking data.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 8h ago
DEX data has little reference value; CEX is the main source of trading volume.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 8h ago
According to the data, the limitations of this statistical framework are indeed worth in-depth scrutiny—DEX trading volume share may be seriously overestimated. It is recommended to adopt the following approach for a comprehensive assessment: 1) include CEX spot trading data 2) supplement derivatives trading dimensions 3) exclude the impact of bot trading. Based on on-chain data, the true DEX share should be between 15-22%, rather than the surface data of over 30%. Risk warning: Selective data often hides narrative bias, and market participants need to be cautious of such incomplete statistical paradigms.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperervip
· 8h ago
Hmm, it's the same old trick. Jumping to conclusions based only on DEX, while ignoring the volume on CEX. Who would believe such statistics?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)