🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
In on-chain finance, the most common issues often don't stem from the strategies themselves but from the data pipeline. Usually, they go unnoticed, but when market fluctuations happen, problems surface—price feed failures, diverse data sources, insufficient anomaly handling, and eventually, tricks in liquidation and settlement.
Interestingly, many people think they are being squeezed by market movements, but the root cause lies in the underlying pricing mechanism. Data deviations amplify, and the liquidation logic becomes chaotic.
Why is this important? Because some infrastructure is indeed trying to address this pain point. For example, making pricing and data integration into a verifiable, reusable foundation—so multiple data sources can run together, reducing single-point deviation risks. The price feed mechanism becomes more aligned with various protocols' needs, on-chain data transparency increases, and project teams have a better chance to implement more detailed risk controls.
The result is: fewer users encounter abnormal liquidations, the settlement process becomes more predictable, and even in extreme market volatility, the system's resilience is stronger.
If you're working on any pricing-dependent products within the Tron ecosystem, one suggestion: start by evaluating the oracle and data layer. The stability of these two directly determines whether your subsequent returns can be reliably realized.