2025-12-30 21:24:57

The Meme craze has been coming wave after wave, but what happens after the wind blows past? That’s when a project is truly tested. Many projects tend to collapse at their peak popularity, and the reason is simple—more people often lead to chaos. Rumors flying everywhere, newcomers just wanting to ride the wave, communities lacking real execution power, and on-chain activity dropping sharply.

Some projects have realized this problem and started designing more systematic participation methods. For example, clear division of responsibilities: who is responsible for content, who handles promotion, who organizes interactions, and who drives on-chain activity. The core value of the platform is actually to lower the barriers to these collaborations, allowing ordinary people to find their place instead of passively watching.

Want to be more stable in the Meme track? My suggestion is to evaluate projects through the dimension of "collaboration density." Specifically, ask yourself a few questions: Is content updating continuously? Is interaction hotness stable? Are participation pathways clear enough? Can the popularity be consolidated into lasting consensus and liquidity? Those who can answer these well are often the ones who can go further.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredApeResistance

· 9h ago

To be honest, most meme projects are just a flash in the pan; once the hype dies down, they're all finished. The concept of collaboration density actually has some merit; it's much more reliable than those projects that just boast without substance. The ones that truly survive are those with real people doing actual work, not just a bunch of leeks cutting each other.

View OriginalReply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 9h ago

Really, when the hype comes, it's all retail investors rushing in, and then the project team also rides the wave, resulting in the community disappearing. From the perspective of collaboration density, it's a good point, but to be honest, most meme projects can't achieve that; they survive purely on luck. Sustainable liquidity is too difficult; look at those that were once popular—now they don't even have ghosts.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 9h ago

That's right, only after the hype subsides can you see who really has substance. Projects that only hype concepts should have already faded away. I like the collaboration density framework; it's much more reliable than just looking at the price increase. A true meme project needs someone to put in effort; otherwise, it's just empty air. Hype needs to settle into consensus; otherwise, it's just like riding the wave.

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 9h ago

That's right, when the hype cools down, it's obvious who's just swimming naked. It's really the beginning of the divergence; many projects have exposed their true colors. The perspective of collaboration density is quite fresh, but I want to ask how many projects can really stick it out.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentLossFan

· 9h ago

That's right. Only after the hype dies down do you realize who's swimming naked. Most meme projects are like that. The perspective of "collaboration density" is not bad; it depends on whether the community has real actionability.

View OriginalReply0

MEVVictimAlliance

· 9h ago

It's really true; the moment the hype subsides is when character is truly revealed, and many projects immediately show their true colors. From the perspective of collaboration intensity, it still looks decent, but in actual execution, there are very few that can be truly reliable. Once on-chain activity drops, it's basically impossible to turn things around.

View OriginalReply0