2025-12-30 21:25:06

Want to keep the heat of Meme from fading? It depends on whether the community can turn attention into a truly on-chain structure—lower participation barriers, smoother transaction experience, more timely liquidity replenishment, plus engaging interactive gameplay that keeps attracting people. As long as the structure is in place, the buzz is less likely to cool down; without a supporting structure, even high popularity will just fade quickly.

Low-friction platforms play a key role here. Simple initiation, quick participation, seamless transactions—this allows the community to focus their energy on content creativity and event design. Especially on networks with obvious advantages in transaction costs and speed, small amounts of funds can participate frequently, and each on-chain interaction can be recorded as actual data. This creates a positive feedback loop between popularity and liquidity that can keep spinning.

Want to improve your success rate in Meme projects? Prioritize platforms and projects that can genuinely reduce participation costs and improve interaction efficiency. Higher efficiency allows attention to truly evolve into market consensus, and consensus can develop into long-term supporting liquidity.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BTCWaveRider

· 9h ago

Forget it, it's the same old story again, structure structure structure. Honestly, it just depends on whether the platform can hold up liquidity. What is low friction? Basically, it means gas fees shouldn't be too outrageous, and speed shouldn't be too slow. As for the hype around Meme fading, no one really cares; it's all about炒概念 (speculative concepts). Claims about participation success rates are a bit far-fetched; luck probably plays a big role. Enough, we're just going in circles again. The real issue is community governance; structure is just on paper. I just want to know, which platform has truly achieved low friction? Turning hype into structure sounds very professional, but in reality, it just depends on whether someone is willing to take over.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 9h ago

nah this is just alchemy 101... friction = death spiral for hype, everyone knows this. the real transmutation happens when infrastructure actually *works* tho, not just theoretically lol

Reply0

GateUser-a180694b

· 9h ago

Well said, low friction is the key, otherwise no matter how hot the hype is, it's all in vain. Structure is indeed the key; meme projects without this foundation will eventually fade away. Trading smoothness can truly determine everything; lagging means death. There's no doubt about it, I will directly pass on projects with high participation costs. Small, frequent trades are necessary to build consensus; this logic makes sense. It looks like I need to find the chain with the lowest trading costs to play on.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 9h ago

In simple terms, infrastructure needs to keep up; otherwise, even the hottest coins are just a flash in the pan. Those still playing on high gas fee chains for memes are truly just shooting themselves in the foot. Low friction is the way to go, allowing people to trade without worrying about fees. This is what I’ve been emphasizing all along—only with a solid structure can there be sustained popularity; pure hype will die out. Once the positive feedback loop of liquidity kicks in, it’s unstoppable. This thing really works. Lower participation costs allow retail investors to truly get involved; otherwise, it’s just an institutional game. The difference between well-structured projects and trash coins lies right here. The key still depends on whether the platform is willing to optimize these details.

View OriginalReply0

probably_nothing_anon

· 9h ago

You're right, I'm just worried that if the hype rises, the community won't keep up, and as a result, the market will be cooled down artificially. Low friction is really key; otherwise, even the best ideas are useless. Small, high-frequency participation is the way to go; data accumulation will naturally bring liquidity. Structure determines everything; this is what long-term players should be paying attention to.

View OriginalReply0