2025-12-30 22:20:42

Recently, the Federal Reserve has injected another 26 billion USD into the system, and social media is buzzing with cheers and excitement, with voices saying "The liquidity is coming, the bull market is taking off" one after another. But think again—is this really a good thing for the market?

Honestly, this 26 billion USD seems more like an emergency patch for the financial system. Those areas that require the central bank to work overtime to plug holes are under pressure that can no longer be delayed. On the surface, the market appears to breathe a sigh of relief, but the problems are only postponed and have not disappeared.

The easiest to derail at this moment is to follow emotions and media headlines. What you see as a "major positive" might just be a smokescreen used by institutions to cover their exit. When liquidity flows in the shadows, every move on the K-line, how much of it reflects real demand and how much is a carefully orchestrated trap?

In the information war, retail investors chase the hype, while veterans look at the substance. And that substance is often hidden in verified on-chain data, which will never appear in the trending jokes on major platforms.

Honestly, every time I make a market judgment, I refer to the data perspective from decentralized oracle networks. Not to find opinions, but to find facts—that is, market truths verified by multiple nodes and difficult to manipulate by any single party. In sensitive moments like this with the Federal Reserve, what you really need to ask is:

Where is the on-chain stablecoin flowing? Is it piling into risk assets or fleeing to safe havens?

Do the funding rates and leverage positions on exchanges truly confirm the market's supposed "optimism"?

When mainstream interpretations talk about "liquidity injection," are the large addresses on-chain actually eating up the supply, or are they taking advantage of the rebound to offload?

This kind of data provides you with a filter to cut through the noise. You are no longer limited to the emotional performance of a single information source but can judge based on on-chain facts that are validated by multiple independent nodes.

One last thought: Every move by the Federal Reserve has a dual identity—one is the "user manual" for ordinary market participants, and the other is the "health report" for the elite circle. Our job is not to memorize the manual but to do our best to understand that real health report.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DancingCandles

· 8h ago

Coming with this again? It's just a 26 billion patch, do you really think it's a positive signal? Big players are dumping, and you're still boosting the hype. On-chain data is the truth; don't be led astray. A quick check of stablecoin flows tells the real story; there's no need to listen to media stories. Can funding rates lie? Just look for yourself. This move is just a smoke screen to cover their exit; retail investors are still cheering. The Federal Reserve is playing a double identity game; understanding it is the key to survival.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 8h ago

260 billion patch, that's all. Those who are optimistic are already running, retail investors are still shouting bull market. On-chain data doesn't lie; the flow of stablecoins is the real truth. It's another information war. While institutions are selling off, I'm still buying in. Funding rates speak for themselves; don't listen to media nonsense. Are the big players still buying or selling? That's what really matters. This rebound feels a bit strange, like an ambush in advance. Looking at the oracle data, hmm, better to stay cautious for now. Medical reports and prospectuses are completely different; I trust the on-chain data.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 8h ago

Really, looking at on-chain data is much more reliable than reading news headlines. As for the 26 billion, it's basically about patching vulnerabilities. Retail investors jumping in to join the hype are always the last to know the truth. I now focus on stablecoin flows and the movements of big players. It's another information war. The market is most excited when institutions step in. Only after experiencing this a few times do you understand. Honestly, whether the Federal Reserve loosens or tightens depends on how large on-chain holders move. Saying it's good news publicly doesn't matter; where the money flows is the real story. This might be another trap. The most heated discussions are often the most dangerous. Experienced traders are all watching on-chain data. What are the fee rates and holdings bragging about? Comparing them reveals whether it's genuine optimism or false celebration. People who treat news as fact have already been fooled. I only trust information verified by multiple nodes.

View OriginalReply0

RunWhenCut

· 8h ago

In simple terms, this round of liquidity injection is just patching the system, not any good news... You can only understand what big players are really doing by looking at on-chain data. --- Retail investors are still celebrating 26 billion, but institutions have already offloaded during the rebound. The information gap is this big. --- Every time these moments happen, keep an eye on the flow of stablecoins. Don't be fooled by media headlines. --- The central bank is plugging holes late at night. Do you think that's good news? Wake up, everyone. --- On-chain data is right there; it's much more sincere than any influencer’s analysis. --- The Federal Reserve’s words often contradict their actual actions. Just look at the leverage in on-chain holdings to understand. --- Why are people all watching trending searches but not on-chain? Big players’ moves can’t be fooled.

View OriginalReply0