2025-12-30 22:20:59

Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon: ZK solutions that attempt to strike a balance between privacy and compliance are beginning to gain market favor.

Looking at recent cases makes this clear. Aztec's compliant zk.money allows users to monitor transaction amounts while hiding identity information; Tornado Nova has integrated an off-chain compliance check mechanism; Manta's zkSBT enables users to prove they meet compliance requirements without revealing any personal details. The common point among these solutions is the use of selective disclosure and regulatory interface design—essentially leaving an opening for regulators without exposing all user information.

Market data is even more convincing: transaction volume using these compliant privacy protocols increased by 400% quarter-over-quarter, while those without compliance saw a 70% decline. The contrast is quite significant.

What’s more noteworthy is the change in regulatory attitude. Previously, there was a wait-and-see approach toward privacy technologies, but now regulators are beginning to recognize the legitimacy and necessity of zero-knowledge proofs in privacy protection. This not only reassures developers but also, to some extent, redefines the development direction of privacy protocols—not a black-and-white choice, but a solution acceptable to both sides.

MANTA6.79%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ETH_Maxi_Taxi

· 7m ago

Wow, the data gap is too outrageous, 400% vs -70%. It's obvious that compliance is the way to go.

View OriginalReply0

ApeEscapeArtist

· 6h ago

Haha, finally someone has clarified this matter. Compliance and privacy are indeed the future directions, not compromises. --- 400% growth vs 70% decline, the data difference is very realistic. Those who need to wake up have already woken up. --- Aztec's move is indeed clever; regulators want just that little bit, no need to give everything, selective disclosure is brilliant. --- To be honest, I used to think ZK had to strictly focus on privacy and couldn't back down. Now it seems the technology itself has no stance. --- From cautious observation to approval, everyone understands what this shift means. The privacy track is really getting on the right track. --- I think Manta's zkSBT approach is the smartest, proving you're a good actor without taking off your pants—win-win. --- For those projects still insisting on pure privacy being non-compliant, looking at this growth rate, they probably need to rethink their approach.

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 6h ago

400% growth, 70% decline... The gap is really incredible. It seems that compromise is the way to go. --- As for compliance, honestly, I used to think it was the enemy of privacy. Now it has become the darling? --- Aztec's approach is really clever—leaving a loophole for regulation without fully exposing it. This is probably the correct way to play ZK. --- From observation to recognition, where exactly is the turning point? Just because the data looks good? --- Basically, privacy protocols need to grow up; they can't always hide in the basement. --- Those hardliners are still clinging to the dream of censorship-free privacy, but others are already reaping the benefits of compliance... Reality is cruel. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are finally being taken seriously; it used to be a real hot potato.

View OriginalReply0

LowCapGemHunter

· 6h ago

This is the reality. The era of pure privacy is over; everyone who wants to stay alive has to bow their head. Compliance ZK is actually an art of compromise, but the trading volume comparison (400% vs -70%) clearly shows the issue. Aztec and their team have long seen through this; regulation is a hurdle that can't be bypassed. It's better to take the initiative and engage proactively.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanAccount

· 6h ago

This is the right way. The compromise plan actually won, pretty interesting. Compliance privacy agreements grew by 400%, while non-compliance agreements plummeted by 70%. The data speaks for itself; it's time to shift. Leaving a loophole for regulation can actually help you survive longer. I buy this logic.

View OriginalReply0

ChainComedian

· 6h ago

Huh? Regulatory approval for zero-knowledge proofs? This turn of events is a bit quick, it seems privacy protocols must leave a loophole for regulators to survive. --- Aztec's move is indeed clever, wanting both privacy and compliance, can you really have both? --- A 400% contrast to 70%... if these numbers are true, those teams not complying should reflect on themselves. --- It feels like some kind of compromise, can privacy enthusiasts accept "selective disclosure"? Something feels off. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are finally no longer prohibited, and now they have become the darlings of regulators. Interesting. --- Honestly, I've been waiting a long time for this shift, otherwise privacy projects would always be stuck in the middle and too uncomfortable. --- Manta's logic of allowing proof of compliance without exposing privacy... is indeed a bit extreme, we'll have to see how the subsequent audits turn out. --- The market has spoken with its feet; trading volume can tell the story. Who's still interested in pure privacy projects?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 6h ago

This is the real way out. Compromise is not shameful... The regulators have also woken up.

View OriginalReply0