As the credibility of paper money begins to waver, a discussion about redefining value is quietly heating up in the market.

"The ability to print money endlessly doesn't create energy." This statement has recently sparked heated debate in the financial circle. The background is simple—U.S. federal debt has already surpassed $38.3 trillion, and it continues to grow at a rate of about $2 trillion per year. The numbers sound enormous, but the truly frightening part is the interest payments.

Annual interest expenses of $1.2 trillion—this already exceeds defense spending. What does this mean? The government will have to either cut welfare, raise taxes, or keep printing money. The first two options are politically unfeasible, so the last one becomes the only choice. The result of continuous money issuance is that the money in your wallet becomes increasingly worthless.

This is not alarmist talk. The data is clear: $1 in 2008 has the same purchasing power as only $0.73 in 2025. In other words, the savings of ordinary people are being subtly eroded.

Against this backdrop, Bitcoin's value proposition appears particularly attractive—total supply of 21 million coins, absolutely scarce, and no one can create new ones out of thin air. This is not a new argument, but when macroeconomic pressures become real, this logic shifts from theory to practical consideration.

The market is rethinking what truly constitutes a store of value. When the credibility of fiat currency shows cracks, digital assets backed by energy are beginning to attract increasing attention.