When it comes to the value of content delivery networks, most people tend to overlook them because they are not as immediately tangible as transactions. But what truly determines whether an ecosystem can go far are these "invisible" elements.



Imagine if community discussions, project documentation, and creator works all rely on a single node for storage—how risky is that? If that node encounters issues, the collective memory of the entire ecosystem is broken. But with a distributed content delivery protocol, it's a different story—the more nodes participate in sharing and storage, the more stable the network becomes, and the lower the costs.

What is the practical significance of this for the ecosystem? For project teams, content delivery becomes more reliable, and the cost structure can be controlled. For the community, data is less likely to be lost, and memories are easier to preserve. For the entire ecosystem, resilience against risks is stronger, and the stories it can tell are longer.

Many people chase after hot trends, but true competitiveness often comes from "carrying capacity." The next opportunity might be hidden in seemingly unsexy areas like content and data infrastructure—they may not appear on trending searches every day, but at critical moments, they determine how far an ecosystem can expand.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BagHolderTillRetirevip
· 6h ago
No, this is the real infrastructure of Web3. It's much more reliable than those flashy concepts.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 6h ago
Infrastructure is really underestimated. Everyone is focused on trading volume, but little do they know that if one node crashes, the entire memory is gone.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 6h ago
That's right, infrastructure is the moat, but most people can't see it. --- This is true long-termism, but unfortunately no one is willing to be boring. --- Distributed storage is indeed impressive, but who will pay the bill? --- Infrastructure may be boring, but without it, nothing can run. --- It sounds reasonable, but how many projects that are actually implemented are truly well done? --- That's why we should look at the lineage rather than chasing hot topics. --- Exactly, decentralized storage is the real way to go.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQvip
· 6h ago
ngl this hits different... the unglamorous infrastructure layer literally becomes the aesthetic foundation of an entire ecosystem. it's like benjamin talking about mechanical reproduction, except now we're talking about distributed memory as proof of cultural persistence
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)