🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Have you heard of stories like this? A friend was impressed by a trader's track record—over 90% win rate, packed with profit records. Excited, they jumped in, only to see their account drop from five figures to three figures in less than half a month. This isn't a joke; such things happen every day in the crypto world.
We must face a reality: too many people treat win rate as the only benchmark for trading skill. But there's a serious overlooked truth—high win rate doesn't necessarily mean stable profits and can actually be the biggest trap.
Those claiming over 90% win rate while trading frequently usually follow just three routines. First, using high leverage to chase tiny profits. Second, taking profits immediately after a small gain. Third, holding onto losing positions without setting stop-losses. The result is: short-term accumulation of impressive win rate numbers, attracting wave after wave of retail traders to follow suit.
Where's the problem? The essence of trading isn't "how many times you win," but "how much you earn when you win and how much you lose when you don't."
A comparison makes this clear. I've seen seasoned traders with stable profits, whose win rates are often around 50% or even lower. But why can they make money long-term? The secret is two words: discipline. Strict stop-loss enforcement and reasonable risk-reward ratios. For example, setting a take profit at 3 points and a stop-loss at 1 point. Even with only 50% winning trades, they still make money over the long run.
And that high win rate approach is like betting on 100 small wins to gamble on 1 big loss. Probabilistically, it will eventually blow up. This isn't a technical issue; it's a math problem.