Having looked at many ecosystem playbooks, I often feel they follow a similar pattern—big splash events that generate short-term data spikes, but once subsidies end and enthusiasm cools down, users disperse completely. How long can this "cat-and-mouse" growth last? Honestly, I’m not very optimistic.

The ecosystems that truly go out and expand are actually not using this approach. What are they doing? Building a repeatable, operational system—developers know where to find resources, projects understand how to connect with infrastructure and ecosystem partners, and users know what to do next, how to use, and how to exit after joining. It sounds simple, but in reality, it requires standardizing and systematizing every link.

Take the Tron ecosystem as an example. It’s like building an automated "ecosystem production line." Infrastructure, development tools, community operations—once these are standardized, new projects don’t have to start from scratch to build a complete system. Existing projects can also connect user pathways through interactions with other applications, rather than just拼增长. This significantly reduces the learning curve for entering the ecosystem, allowing users to flow and combine across multiple applications with low friction.

Once such a system is established, growth becomes compound—no longer relying on creating new爆点 each time, but on strengthening the collaborative capabilities itself. Collaboration becomes a habit, and growth won’t easily break off.

So, if you’re evaluating the long-term potential of the Tron ecosystem, it’s worth paying more attention to whether this "repeatable collaboration capability" is continuously upgrading, rather than being fooled by short-term buzz and hot topics.