How far can a public chain ecosystem go? Ultimately, it depends on "whether there is a system."



A scattered ecosystem may seem lively, but it easily falls into a vicious cycle of everyone fighting their own battles—developers can't find stable resources and support channels, new projects have nowhere to grow through collaboration, user feedback goes unheard, and tool standards become increasingly fragmented. Over time, it may look lively, but the true growth momentum is waning.

Conversely, ecosystems with organizational strength are different. They connect scattered innovations into a system, where breakthroughs at individual points gradually evolve into scale effects. Growth can then shift from short-term hype to long-term structure.

The approach of the TRON ecosystem actually follows this logic—by improving infrastructure, building developer support systems, and promoting collaboration between projects, making new applications easier to discover and use. The overall innovation efficiency and user experience of the ecosystem are thus enhanced. Such systematic construction is the true foundation for sustainable prosperity of the ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasGoblinvip
· 5h ago
That's right, many blockchains have this problem. They hype up the ecosystem being vibrant every day, but everything falls apart, and developers leave even faster than they arrived.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 5h ago
The chaotic ecosystem should have been regulated long ago. Fighting alone won't last long.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 5h ago
A scattered ecosystem is really too exhausting; it looks lively but is actually just internal competition. --- Systematization is correct to say, but the key is to actually take action, not just shout slogans. --- TRON has indeed been catching up over the years, which is better than those who only know how to cut leeks. --- The question is how many developers truly believe, or are they just waiting to see if the promises can be fulfilled later. --- Systematic construction sounds beautiful, but the real challenge is in implementation. --- I agree with this logic, but we also need to guard against it turning into a self-indulgent celebration of the big public chains. --- Reliable infrastructure can indeed retain people; otherwise, projects would have already moved to other chains.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMomvip
· 5h ago
The system is very important, but how many public chains have truly mastered this now? Most are still burning money to compete for projects.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0cvip
· 5h ago
You're right, an ecosystem without a structured system is just a scattered mess. No matter how lively it is, it's pointless. A systematic approach is the key to long-term competitiveness. TRON has indeed taken the lead in this aspect. Disorganized ecosystems ultimately lead to self-destruction. What appears to be prosperous is actually in decline.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStakervip
· 6h ago
Systematic construction is indeed the hard truth, but it's easier to say than to do.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)