Good morning. As soon as I open my eyes and look at the market data, I start to feel a bit anxious. The Federal Reserve is once again in a rate-cutting cycle, and the market is buzzing — a new round of liquidity is on the way.

ETH's current position is a bit awkward, stuck at 2940, with resistance above and support below, and room on both sides. But if you ask me how I feel? Today, a clear direction is likely to emerge.

This isn't just ordinary volatility. Looking at the 4-hour chart, the price is squeezed in the middle, and the MACD momentum is still hesitating. To go higher, the 2965 level must be broken and stabilized before aiming for 3030. If it drops, 2890 is the first line of defense. Once broken, the region from 2780 to 2730 might see a retest and possibly a reversal.

But more worth pondering than just guessing the direction is: how is this game actually played? When liquidity injections become an open secret, what gives you the right to judge where the money will ultimately flow?

When news is everywhere, what truly counts as your "reference standard"?

The news about the Federal Reserve's liquidity measures can instantly ignite market sentiment. But the reality is harsh — the "news" and "data" retail investors see are often delayed, filtered, or even manipulated.

The prices you see on exchanges — are they just quotes from a single platform, or genuine market consensus? No one can say for sure.

While everyone is asking "Can liquidity injections push prices up," a more fundamental question is being overlooked: Is the "price" you base your decisions on real? Can it be trusted not to be manipulated? Is the data updated in real-time?

This is why infrastructure like decentralized oracles exists. When information overload and liquidity dynamics become complex, they do more than just provide data — they offer a "verifiable truth." In the noise of the market, this is what you can truly rely on.