The competition among oracles essentially comes down to who can remain stable in complex environments. Asset types are exploding, various protocols are stacking on top of each other like Lego blocks, and extreme market conditions are becoming more frequent. In this context, the data layer must be robust: multi-source redundancy, fast updates, anomaly detection, and the ability to handle extreme situations.



This is why some infrastructure projects are worth paying attention to—they standardize and modularize these capabilities, enabling the entire ecosystem to support more complex financial structures and larger capital scales. Once such a stable foundation is in place, the efficiency of protocol composition and innovation within the ecosystem improves. Different products can quickly assemble on the same trusted data set, creating positive feedback loops.

For users, the benefits are straightforward: fewer unexpected liquidations caused by abnormal price feeds, and reduced operational risks from sudden outages. These may seem small, but cumulatively they significantly lower hidden costs. If you're evaluating projects, it’s recommended to focus on their real-world performance under stress and market adoption—those critical underlying capabilities are often validated only through extreme testing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropSkepticvip
· 4h ago
The key still depends on who doesn't collapse in extreme market conditions, this is true strength. Oracles are unreliable; their true nature is revealed during extreme market conditions. That's right, infrastructure needs to be stable before the ecosystem can innovate; otherwise, it's all in vain. Multi-source redundancy is indeed important; a single point of failure is too deadly. It feels like everyone is now racing to update data faster, but the real test is the ability to detect anomalies. Instead of listening to project teams boast, it's better to see how they performed during the May market surge. Hidden costs are underestimated; if the liquidation mechanism fails, the entire ecosystem collapses.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossipervip
· 4h ago
At the end of the day, it still depends on who won't drop the ball at critical moments. Those that can withstand extreme market tests are the true infrastructure. --- I agree with this logic, but is it really that easy to identify the right projects when choosing? --- Multi-source redundancy, rapid updates, extreme safety nets... sounds simple, but how many can truly achieve all of these? --- The key is performance under stress testing; everything else is superficial. --- I'm a bit skeptical about positive feedback; truly forming it is still an ideal scenario... --- Reducing implicit costs is the most practical; users need to feel it. --- For oracles to truly stabilize, the entire ecosystem's potential can then be unlocked. --- The problem is that the degree of adoption is often not the most resilient, and there's a game of strategy involved.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 4h ago
Speaking frankly, when extreme market conditions hit, the shortcomings of the infrastructure are fully exposed. --- Regarding liquidation risk, just a slight data delay could lead to liquidation; only true heroes can withstand that. --- The problem is that most protocols are still gambling and haven't conducted proper stress testing. --- Multi-source redundancy sounds simple, but very few can achieve on-chain stability at that level. --- A few days ago, during market volatility, a certain oracle's delay made me see clearly who the paper tigers are. --- Only when the foundation is stable can the ecosystem be built; many projects are actually doing the opposite now. --- This is the real infrastructure competition; it's not about whose token's price rises faster.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStakervip
· 4h ago
stress-testing oracles is where the rubber meets the road... most projects just talk about redundancy until mainnet goes sideways lol
Reply0
GasGoblinvip
· 4h ago
Honestly, if the oracle sector fails, the entire ecosystem will go down with it. We've seen clearly in previous extreme market conditions who is reliable and who isn't. --- Multi-source redundancy sounds simple, but very few can actually maintain chain integrity under extreme circumstances. That's why I now focus on stress test performance when choosing projects. --- A nightmare caused by price feed anomalies leading to liquidations is something I will never forget. This is the true test of whether infrastructure is valuable. --- If the underlying layer isn't stable, no matter how many applications are built on top, it's all pointless—just like a building with a weak foundation. --- No matter how many ecosystem protocols are stacked, if the data layer has issues, everything is connected and at risk. Who can bear that kind of risk? --- Look at those infrastructure projects that can hold up at critical moments—that's truly worth investing in. No matter how loud the hype, it’s useless without solid fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt