2025-12-31 00:30:16

#战略性加仓BTC $BTC $ZEC $UNI

💥Breaking News: The Truth Behind the Burn of 100 Million UNI — Tokenomics Model Completely Reshaped

This is not a hype about meme coins, but a real construction of a closed-loop cash flow. Burning 100 million UNI is equivalent to directly removing $600 million worth of liquidity. This is not just marketing hype; fundamentally, it is about addressing the oversupply issue of the past five years, using hard currency to heal the ecological imbalance.

The core innovation lies in the "Fee Switch + On-Chain Auto-Buyback" mechanism. 10% to 25% of the protocol’s revenue will continuously be used for market buybacks and UNI burns. In other words — the more active a DEX’s trading volume, the more a perpetual "buying machine" absorbs UNI, continuously buying and burning regardless of price levels. This completely locks the positive correlation between business growth and token scarcity.

Furthermore, the implementation of the self-built Unichain is crucial. Gas fees paid by users are no longer lost to the public chain ecosystem but are fully accumulated as protocol endogenous revenue, which is ultimately fed back to UNI holders through the buyback mechanism. Costs are directly converted into revenue, truly forming an ecological closed loop.

UNI’s identity is undergoing a dramatic transformation — from a simple governance token to a yield-generating asset. The valuation system is also shifting: no longer based on the elusive "market cap-to-GDP ratio," but anchored to a tangible "price-to-earnings ratio." The current implied PE ratio ranges from 12 to 24, almost at cost price within the entire crypto asset space.

With 97% community support for this round of reform, regulatory windows are gradually opening, and market timing is now ripe. UNI is evolving from a defensive token into a true value engine for the DeFi ecosystem. In the next cycle, reaching the top five targets is no longer a distant goal.

BTC1.22%

ZEC-1.66%

UNI-0.35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WagmiWarrior

· 6h ago

Oh wow, this PE multiple is really tempting, but I'm worried it might just be all talk and no action. UNI's recent moves look quite solid; the burn + buyback mechanism locking in scarcity is indeed a clever move. Wait, if Unichain can really accumulate gas fees, that would truly be a game-changer. A 97% support rate is shocking; we need to watch out for the tricks after the main players push the market up. But on the other hand, transforming governance tokens into yield-generating assets is definitely worth analyzing.

View OriginalReply0

FlyingLeek

· 6h ago

Damn, this time UNI is finally going to do something real. The burn mechanism is like a perpetual motion machine as soon as it goes live. People have been foolishly buying for so many years, finally waiting for a day with actual cash flow support. A 97% support rate is a bit suspicious. Such high consensus actually makes me a little uneasy. Automatic buyback sounds great, but I'm just worried that the execution might be another story. All of Unichain's gas fees are being accumulated, which is a brilliant idea. Finally not being drained by Ethereum. A 12-24x PE is indeed cheap in crypto, but don’t forget UNI was this cheap before. Someone should have turned governance tokens into yield-bearing assets long ago. I just don’t understand why so many projects are still playing with air. Next cycle, aim for the top five? Not to boast, let’s see how many months the burn mechanism can hold up first.

View OriginalReply0

TheMemefather

· 6h ago

Uh, this buyback and burn mechanism does have some substance, but calling PE 12-24x the cost price? That's a bit of a stretch. --- Unichain issuing its own tokens and collecting gas fees itself—this closed-loop logic is a bit over the top... What about the risks? --- How did the 97% support rate come about? Do they have no idea what proportion of the community voted? --- They’re hyping it up quite a bit, but I’m just worried that it might turn into another "ecological reshaping" comedy. --- What really matters is that "endless buying machine"—that’s the key point, everything else is just packaging. --- Turning governance tokens into yield-bearing assets sounds good, but only real if it can be redeemed. --- The regulatory window is opening... first, we need to clarify whether this premise is reliable. --- How was the figure of $600 million in tokens burned calculated? We need to look at the details. --- The top five in the next cycle—it's a bit early to say that now. Don’t get proven wrong later.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAnxiety