🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
#以太坊投资机会 Seeing the voices of Yili Hua and Nansen CEO at this node, a familiar feeling arises in my mind. I've seen this kind of situation too many times.
Back in 2015, shortly after Ethereum launched, there was also constant controversy—some called it a masterpiece of genius, while more people said it was a utopian fantasy. By the 2017 bull market, all doubts were drowned out by the price surge, and the entire ecosystem fell into a strange complacency. Then came the crash of 2018, and those once most fervent believers turned out to be the most disappointed.
The current situation reminds me of that cycle. On one side, whales are quietly accumulating spot holdings—this is a vote with real gold and silver; on the other side, the community is filled with a sense of "we've already won." Alex's words are quite piercing—when all objections turn into "those data are fake" and "we still have TVL," it means that vigilance is waning.
The lesson from history is clear: every ecosystem crisis is often not caused by external shocks, but by internal complacency. Ethereum has come this far precisely because it once had enough crisis awareness to iterate. The current consensus to buy in is very well-formed, but the real test is whether this community can maintain that paranoia and vigilance after the consensus is formed. Looking back from 2030, the choices made now will speak for themselves.