Flash loans in the world of decentralized finance are like the "time freeze" ability in sci-fi movies—you can mobilize hundreds of millions of dollars within seconds, with zero collateral, as long as you repay within the same block. This instant release of purchasing power is a double-edged sword for liquidity: on one hand, it can catalyze market opportunities; on the other, it’s the most dangerous tool in the hands of bad actors.



To date, we have seen countless protocols fall into the trap of flash loans. Hackers manipulate oracles by executing rapid sell-offs, causing protocols to collapse like dominoes. But recently, APRO’s performance has broken this curse—it not only withstood attacks but also caused hackers to suffer huge losses after spending high gas fees and cross-chain costs, as they couldn’t close profitable positions.

What’s the secret behind this "defense and counterattack"? It starts with the hackers’ usual tactics. Most flash loan attacks don’t directly exploit contract code but instead use massive instantaneous trading volumes to "brainwash" or manipulate oracles. For example, imagine a small stall selling ten watermelons; suddenly, someone places a 10,000-dollar order to buy all of them, pushing the watermelon price to an absurd high. If a lending protocol is watching this quote closely, hackers can use this false high price as collateral to scam real funds out of the protocol.

APRO’s defensive approach takes a different turn—it no longer blindly trusts a single data source but has built what I call a "liquidity-weighted consensus" mechanism. In this architecture, the oracle is no longer just a simple price crawler but has been upgraded into an intelligent agent with a "time smoothing" algorithm, capable of recognizing abnormal fluctuations and defending against them.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationWizardvip
· 3h ago
The watermelon stand analogy is brilliant; finally, there's an agreement that understands how to defend itself.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperervip
· 3h ago
The watermelon stand analogy is brilliant, but to be honest, I'm still a bit surprised that APRO can hold up, considering so many protocols have failed before.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercodervip
· 3h ago
Damn, the hacker gets counter-killed and still has to pay the Gas fee. This is the real social anxiety scene, haha.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 3h ago
I feel that APRO's recent protection measures are actually effective; finally, there's a protocol that isn't exploited by flash loans for arbitrage. I need to review the hacker's losses; just hearing about the time smoothing algorithm sounds a bit vague. With oracles and cross-chain solutions, how high are the costs of this defense? Could it end up negatively impacting user experience? However, enduring attacks while making hackers pay for Gas fees is a really satisfying logic; gotta give some respect. I'm just worried it might be another round of security drama, with new vulnerabilities emerging next month...
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviservip
· 3h ago
Wow, APRO's counterattack this time is really brilliant. The hacker shot himself in the foot by moving the stone, and the Gas fee + cross-chain fee literally trapped him. Haha
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)