2025-12-31 01:25:54

AGLD has been quite active these days, with a short-term increase of 4.41%. What exactly is behind this?

Looking at the data, it’s quite interesting. As the price rapidly rises, it has surged by 21% in the short term, and trading volume has reached 1.5 billion USD. Such a level of trading volume indicates a high level of market participation. On the futures side, it’s even more outrageous—someone achieved a 179% return on a contract. Such volatility definitely attracts short-term attention.

What about the technical analysis? Currently, AGLD is near the resistance level of the descending channel. If it can break through effectively, there could be a subsequent 100-110% upward potential. This is a good entry point, but only if it can truly break through this resistance.

The community is generally optimistic, with about 80% positive sentiment. Recently, there have been collaborations with projects like NonBank and Zoro, which are strengthening AGLD’s practical application scenarios and ecological value.

If you want to participate in AGLDUSDT contract trading, a short-term long strategy could be considered. It’s recommended to use 1.5x leverage and set a stop-loss 5% below the current price. This way, you can participate while controlling risk. Of course, the crypto market is highly volatile, so stop-loss orders must be strictly executed.

AGLD7.77%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHermit

· 3h ago

179% profit? Damn, that move was really fierce, but I'll first see if it can break resistance before making any decisions. AGLD's recent collaboration was pretty good, NonBank is reliable, quite interesting. Wait, can it really break 100% increase, or is this just another contract harvest scheme? Damn, making quick money in short-term trading is really tough, better stick with spot holdings. Where is the resistance level? Why do I always feel like analysts' target prices never pan out? A trading volume of 1.5 billion is impressive, it shows that someone is really throwing money around. Using 1.5x leverage is a safe suggestion, but I don't believe the stop-loss can be maintained consistently. Community is 80% optimistic? That makes me a bit hesitant. Is the NonBank collaboration real or fake? Has anyone verified it? Forget it, I'll wait for a pullback to get in. Chasing high now is too risky.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 3h ago

Wait, 179% contract profit? That number sounds a bit outrageous; we need to verify whether it's the kind of false prosperity before a liquidation. 1.5x leverage sounds stable, but the question is whether AGLD can really break through the resistance level this time. It's still uncertain; let's keep an eye on the data. Is the NonBank partnership reliable? We need to dig into whether there's any marketing component involved. 80% of the community is optimistic, which is a bit suspicious—extreme consensus often indicates something. Short-term participation is okay, but strict stop-losses must be enforced; it's not just for show.

View OriginalReply0

SudoRm-RfWallet/

· 3h ago

179% profit? Bro, this market is indeed extraordinary, the contract monsters are harvesting again. --- 150 million in trading volume, this is real funding pushing it, not retail hype. --- Breaking through resistance levels to 100-110%? Sounds good, but the key point is what I always say: can it really break through? --- 80% of the community is optimistic, but I’m actually a bit scared. Usually, this is the most dangerous time. --- Is the collaboration between NonBank and Zoro considered news, or are they just storytelling again? --- 1.5x leverage, 5% stop-loss. I’ve heard this spiel too many times; most end up liquidated. --- AGLD’s recent surge is indeed impressive, but after a short-term monster gain of 179%, it usually dips. Better to be cautious.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryer

· 3h ago

It's the same old trick, first pump the market to attract retail investors to buy in.

View OriginalReply0