Jupiter co-founder SIONG recently raised an interesting topic—the question of whether to continue investing in JUP buybacks.



His logic is straightforward: last year, the company spent over $70 million on buybacks, but the price hardly increased. Since throwing money at it hasn't yielded results, why not change the approach—use that money to incentivize growth for existing and new users? This way, it can increase user engagement and cultivate new strength. After proposing this idea, he also specifically sought feedback from the community.

Solana co-founder Toly then shared his perspective. His view is a bit different—capital accumulation itself is a challenging and arduous process. In the context of traditional finance, it takes ten years or even longer to build up a comparable scale of capital. What does this mean? It means that short-term buybacks may indeed show little effect, but from the perspective of long-term value storage, this move might not be a bad idea.

The clash of opinions between these two industry heavyweights actually reflects a core issue in the development of the DeFi ecosystem: during bear markets or periods of volatility, how should token economics be played? Should the focus be on short-term price support, or on betting on long-term ecosystem development? There is no standard answer to this question, but it’s certainly worth every participant’s careful consideration.
JUP1.66%
SOL2.46%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWhisperervip
· 01-06 12:22
70 million invested and it still didn't work; this is the most heartbreaking part.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissentervip
· 01-05 22:46
70 million spent to end up with nothing, this logic makes perfect sense.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetectivevip
· 01-05 15:46
70 million invested with no splash, this is the most authentic portrayal, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
MidsommarWalletvip
· 01-03 18:11
70 million went down the drain, might as well just airdrop it directly to users, at least it would unify people's hearts.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 01-03 13:11
70 million invested and still no increase, this is just outrageous haha
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuyvip
· 01-03 13:08
70 million went down the drain.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivorvip
· 01-03 13:07
70 million invested and the price hasn't moved, this is just ridiculous haha
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyervip
· 01-03 13:04
70 million invested and the price didn't move, this is indeed a bit awkward.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuyvip
· 01-03 12:54
70 million invested and nothing came out of it, this move is really genius haha
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)