The two U.S. parties push forward with crypto legislation: DeFi regulation becomes the focus, Senate to review on January 15

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Blockchain Rhythm】Just entering January, new developments have emerged in the US cryptocurrency market regulation. Recently, bipartisan lawmakers held a meeting and reached some consensus on advancing the Crypto Market Structure Act, while also revealing several disagreements.

According to the key documents produced from the meeting, the Democratic Party’s core demands in the DeFi sector include three aspects: requiring front-end platforms to comply with sanctions and compliance requirements, expanding the “Special Measures” authority of the Treasury Department, and establishing specific regulatory rules for non-decentralized DeFi. Implicitly, this suggests an intention to bring DeFi under a stricter regulatory framework.

In addition, the Democrats have put forward several key demands. First, to adjust the classification standards for crypto assets; second, to introduce investor protection clauses for crypto ATMs and consumer protection; third, to include anti-avoidance provisions to prevent regulatory loopholes. Notably, they also want to set fundraising caps for issuers—each project can raise a maximum of $200 million—and require protocols to proactively report to the SEC and prove they are not securities.

There are still many issues to be further discussed, such as how to regulate stablecoin yields, ethical standards, and conflicts of interest. On the Republican side, efforts are underway to push the Senate Banking Committee to review the bill on January 15. But frankly, whether the two parties can reach a genuine consensus remains uncertain—many unresolved issues persist, and bipartisan cooperation faces significant challenges.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-74b10196vip
· 01-07 04:56
$200 million cap? Are they trying to completely cut off innovative projects? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxietyvip
· 01-07 04:55
$200 million fundraising cap? This is forcing all projects to go overseas, truly incredible. --- DeFi still has to be "non-decentralized"? The very concept is contradictory; are Americans trying to be funny? --- Both sanctions compliance and anti-avoidance? Basically, they want to completely control the crypto market, it's pointless. --- Individual project fundraising capped at $200 million, small projects have no way out, and giants are becoming more monopolistic. --- Regulatory frameworks are becoming stricter. What is the future of the crypto world? Can someone explain how it will develop? --- Frontend platforms complying with sanctions? Isn't that just financial censorship, just talk at the start. --- Are the two parties truly compromising, or do they really want to kill DeFi? I can't understand.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyArbCatvip
· 01-07 04:53
Want to control us to death again, with a $200 million cap? That's hilarious. Are they trying to push all projects towards CEX?
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboyvip
· 01-07 04:28
Want to cut DeFi again? Are you really determined to regulate it to the end? The $200 million fundraising cap is like trying to stifle innovative projects in their infancy.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnonvip
· 01-07 04:26
Here we go again, DeFi is about to be thoroughly hammered this time.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)