Recently, the popularity of the Sui ecosystem has indeed been rising, and one project has attracted a lot of attention—decentralized storage protocol Walrus ($WAL). Compared to those outdated storage solutions, why can this system be considered a challenger to traditional cloud storage?



**Substantive Technical Differences**

Built on the Sui blockchain, Walrus uses erasure coding technology to handle large files. Simply put, data is split and dispersed across network nodes, so even if many nodes go offline, data security is not affected. This mechanism addresses a core pain point of on-chain storage.

Cost is another dimension of advantage. Compared to AWS or other traditional on-chain storage solutions, Walrus’s pricing structure is significantly more competitive. Plus, with built-in privacy features, users’ data privacy rights are better protected—exactly what Web3 ecosystem users value most.

**Practical Driving Force of the Token Mechanism**

$WAL, as the core asset within the protocol, has three layers of value support. First is the consumption scenario—storing files requires WAL payments; second is the staking mechanism—node operators and participants earn rewards through staking while maintaining network security; finally, governance rights—future price adjustments and protocol updates are decided by holders.

This design avoids the path of pure “air coins,” binding token value to actual applications.

**Thoughts on the Track’s Future**

Storage is indeed an important part of infrastructure. Currently, Walrus is still in the early stages of development. Once the ecosystem applications expand, the potential for imagination will be very different. If you’re tired of projects without real-world scenarios, it’s worth paying attention to such solutions with practical application support.
SUI-7.3%
WAL-5.85%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PositionPhobiavip
· 01-07 04:51
Erasing coding sounds impressive, but has it really gained traction? Let's see if it can sustain itself first. It sounds good, but does @WAL@ really have users? Or is it just a pretty mechanism with no one actually using it? Built-in privacy protection? I've heard that phrase too many times; can we really trust it? Staking mining... who still believes in that these days? I don't touch it. AWS can't handle it, stop bragging. Face reality, okay? Why are projects on Sui all so similar? It feels like they're telling the same story. Early stages are just a front; wait until there's a sudden surge and you'll regret it. There are so many players in the storage sector, what makes Walrus stand out?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 01-07 04:49
erasure coding on-chain storage is genuinely interesting but honestly the real test is whether the capital utilization beats traditional cdn economics... w/e, thesis validation would require actual throughput metrics not just whitepaper vibes
Reply0
ReverseTradingGuruvip
· 01-07 04:38
You're back to promote new coins again, erasing codes, staking yields, governance rights... all sound good, but I just want to ask one question: does anyone actually use them? To be honest, the AWS system is old but really effective. WAL sounds promising in terms of prospects, but when will the ecosystem applications actually roll out? I believe in the rising popularity of the Sui ecosystem, but can storage truly break through? Or is it just another concept coin? Let's first see if there's real storage demand before hyping it up—don't become just another project of this year. I'm the reverse indicator guy; I short what I like.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)