2026-01-07 05:20:26

Most traditional payment tools start from a single country's perspective, then get retrofitted for international use—this is the problem. Truly cross-border payment solutions need to be designed from the perspective of global mobility and real-world use cases. Some emerging payment projects are changing this status quo by prioritizing global liquidity, travel convenience, and real-world applications from the outset, rather than patching them in afterward. This is what Web3 payment tools should look like.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MercilessHalal

· 01-07 05:42

This is the correct answer. The traditional approach really needs to be phased out.

View OriginalReply0

ValidatorViking

· 01-07 05:42

yeah nah, the "retrofit trap" is real—seen too many protocols patch governance after mainnet goes live. same energy. these payment layers actually building with cross-border as first principles? that's the validator mindset right there. consensus at scale or gtfo.

Reply0

FloorPriceNightmare

· 01-07 05:32

The traditional patchwork approach to payments has long since died. It's just forcing domestic tools into international shells, resulting in a terrible experience. True Web3 payments should start directly from a global perspective, without all the unnecessary detours.

View OriginalReply0