At the recent AI industry summit, a point really struck me—the concept of high-risk artificial intelligence.



Think about it: when AI is no longer just for chatting or writing copy, but truly involved in payment settlements, on-chain transaction execution, business negotiations, and asset management decisions—areas involving real money—the rules of the game will change completely.

At that point, whether AI is smart or not becomes secondary. The only two critical questions are: Is this thing reliable? Can it be hacked? Can it be trusted? Are there vulnerabilities to attacks?

This is exactly the direction I have been observing—when AI touches on blockchain, DeFi, and on-chain assets involving real value transfer, trust mechanisms and security defenses become the decisive factors. It’s not about how powerful the AI technology itself is, but whether the entire system can withstand the test of risks.
DEFI9.49%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightTradervip
· 2h ago
That's right. The current issue in DeFi is not about how smart the AI trading execution is, but whether it can withstand hackers. The real test is not in the algorithm itself, but in the defenses.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGFvip
· 2h ago
Reliable > Smart, this is the truth of Web3, straightforwardly explained
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 01-07 05:39
That's the real problem. Whether it's intelligent or not doesn't matter; the key is not to lose money. Getting hacked and having your account emptied—no matter how advanced the AI is, it's useless. What Web3 really lacks is this kind of thinking—deep thinking. Speaking of which, when the day comes that AI fully manages assets, how strong do the defenses need to be to feel secure?
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 01-07 05:38
I'm not very confident about AI handling trading execution; if a bug occurs, it could lead to bankruptcy directly. Who will bear this risk?
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHuntervip
· 01-07 05:35
Smart contract security is really a bottleneck, and AI involvement makes it even more complex. Last year, a big influencer's AI trading bot was directly exploited because of a vulnerability in the contract. This is no small matter. Reliability is a thousand times more important than IQ; I agree with this point. If AI decision-making is added to DeFi, the risk factor... would have to be doubled. Human error is manageable, but who is responsible if AI malfunctions?
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessengervip
· 01-07 05:28
It's that simple at the core; being smart or not doesn't really matter. Whether you can be hacked is the real life-or-death line.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpavip
· 01-07 05:28
That's so true. On-chain AI is inherently a powder keg. Being smart or not isn't really the point; the key is whether it can be trusted.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)