Regarding the Walrus project, the market is filled with all kinds of hype, such as "revolutionizing the DeFi landscape" and "a new paradigm for asset management," which makes many people get goosebumps.



But a calm analysis reveals that Walrus is actually a decentralized storage protocol, specifically handling heavy-duty storage tasks like large files, AI training datasets, and video content. Governance voting and staking mechanisms are at best auxiliary features; claiming them as financial innovations seems a bit like storytelling.

This can also be understood—given the current fundraising environment, who dares not to wave the flags of DeFi or AI? In the end, market focus determines all.

Walrus's background is indeed competitive. Institutions like Standard Crypto and Franklin Templeton have invested $140 million, and the team comes from Mysten Labs, a core project in the Sui ecosystem, with strong technical capabilities.

The problem is that the storage track itself is already crowded. Arweave and Filecoin have long occupied leading positions, with new entrants emerging continuously. Walrus's hope that "AI data explosion will drive storage demand" sounds attractive, but in terms of implementation progress, cross-chain interoperability, and zero-knowledge privacy features, most are still in the planning stage.

Looking at the market, the token price hovers around $0.14, with no sharp surges or liquidation risks. Discussions on social media are lively, but the repetition of boilerplate phrases is high, and genuine in-depth conversations are rare.

Interestingly, from a medium- to long-term perspective, data volume will only grow in the AI era. Centralized cloud storage servers frequently malfunction, which is not surprising. The decentralized storage track definitely needs projects to meet these demands. Whether Walrus can shoulder this responsibility depends on the speed of technological implementation and ecosystem development.
WAL-5.85%
SUI-7.3%
AR-6.62%
FIL-5.9%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCryvip
· 12h ago
The storage track is so competitive, Walrus fluctuating around $0.14 is considered normal, anyway Arweave and FC have already taken the lead.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeachervip
· 14h ago
Basically, it's just storytelling. If Arweave and Filecoin couldn't do it, why should Walrus?
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketTeamvip
· 01-07 06:47
Basically, it's a well-told story, but the implementation is still in the planning stage. How can it be launched? Wait, with $140 million injected and Sui ecosystem endorsement, this booster configuration is indeed quite strong. The narrow fluctuation in the coin price indicates that the main force hasn't finished loading the ammunition, or they simply lack confidence. Arweave and Filecoin have already secured their spots. What can Walrus rely on to compete—stories of AI data explosion? I just want to know when we can see real technological breakthroughs instead of marketing breakthroughs.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOnvip
· 01-07 06:45
Honestly, Walrus is just a storage protocol. Don't buy into the hype of DeFi innovation or new asset management paradigms; it's purely a fundraising pitch. The Sui ecosystem background is indeed strong, but Arweave and Filecoin have already divided the market pretty well, leaving little room for newcomers. At a price of $0.14, the market doesn't mean much; it feels like just community self-entertainment. --- The prospects do have some imagination space. In the era of data explosion, decentralized storage is definitely needed, but whether Walrus can survive depends on its implementation efficiency. --- A bunch of institutions have invested 140 million USD, sounds impressive, but in reality, it still feels like talk without action. The functionalities like zero-knowledge proofs haven't been implemented yet. --- With so many players competing in the storage sector, why would Walrus win? The team has a good background, but that doesn't mean the technology is problem-free. --- The token price remains steady, but community discussions are lively. This contradiction is a bit funny—probably just a bunch of repeaters. --- In the AI era, data will indeed explode. If Walrus can truly solve privacy and interoperability issues, there’s long-term potential, but it’s still too early.
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistancevip
· 01-07 06:29
To be honest, many projects are just making up stories. Walrus has been quite honest this time—it's just storage, plain and simple. No need to package it as a financial revolution... The storage track is so competitive now that Arweave and Filecoin have already taken the lead. Walrus wants to break through, and while it's not impossible, it's definitely challenging... The 0.14 narrow fluctuation in price actually indicates that the market is waiting for real data, not betting on concepts. This is a more rational behavior. Technical implementation is the key. No matter how much planning is done in the early stages, it's all useless without execution. I am optimistic about the prospects of decentralized storage, but whether Walrus can run the full race remains to be seen...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt