2026-01-07 06:21:42

If you currently have less than 2000U but want to make a name for yourself in the crypto market, I want to share a real case: a friend entered with 1800U, using a contract rolling strategy, and achieved 80,000U in three months without ever getting liquidated. This isn’t just luck; there’s a complete practical logic behind it.

**Step 1: Divide the principal into three parts, each with different responsibilities**

The key is not to put all your eggs in one basket. Split the 1800U evenly into three parts, each 600U. The first part is for short-term trades, but be disciplined—no more than 2 trades per day. Frequent trading will only accelerate capital depletion. The second part is for waiting for opportunities; don’t mess around in choppy markets—just focus on clear, major trends. The third part is completely idle; this is your safety fund. In extreme market crashes, it can at least preserve your capital for a comeback.

**Step 2: The key is mindset—only take high-confidence opportunities**

Choppy markets are the most capital-draining. Nine out of ten trades may result in losses. Instead of repeatedly fighting in such conditions, wait patiently. When should you enter? Only do so once the trend is clear. Better to miss a wave than to make a wrong trade. Before entering, set a target—if profit exceeds 30%, withdraw half immediately to your account, and let the rest continue to roll. This locks in profits and preserves your capital for further moves.

**Step 3: Discipline—use rules instead of emotions**

Set a stop-loss at 3%, and execute it naturally—like drinking water. Once triggered, don’t hesitate—exit immediately. When profits reach 10%, set a stop-loss to protect gains. This way, you can secure your earnings and stay in the game when the market continues upward.

This friend’s account has now grown to 50,000U. More importantly, he doesn’t stay up late every night watching the screen—just a few minutes each day to check trading signals, and he can execute trades. The core of contract trading isn’t trading every day, but waiting for the right opportunity before acting.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHuntress

· 01-07 08:10

Data shows that those who persist without trading actually earn more, ironic isn't it...

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanKing

· 01-07 06:51

It sounds like this logic is pretty good, but how many people can really stick with it? Wait, the safety net is indeed brilliant; that's the key to survival. 1800U to 80,000? How much patience does that require? I definitely can't do it. I've experienced this firsthand during volatile markets—losing money like crazy. A 3% stop-loss sounds simple, but when executing, the mental pressure is overwhelming, brother. Avoiding liquidation is the most valuable thing; it's more important than anything else. This friend is truly patient; most people would have broken their resolve long ago. The key is discipline—using rules to suppress emotions. It sounds easy but hard to do.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-07 06:50

Honestly, hearing 1,800 to 80,000 sounds pretty unbelievable, but that 3% stop-loss + 30% profit-sharing logic is indeed well thought out... Wait, you really haven't been liquidated? How much patience does that require? Regarding mindset, you're right—don't trade nine out of ten times you lose. But the question is, how do you determine when the trend is "clear"? That's the real hell. Splitting into three parts is a well-known tactic. I agree with the safety fund part, but in actual operation, who can really let the third part sit idle... It's easy to say but hard to do. The key is discipline, which is more important than anything else.

View OriginalReply0

gm_or_ngmi

· 01-07 06:50

Damn, this logic sounds a bit too smooth, doesn't it? In the real market, is it really this gentle? Honestly, a 45x return in 3 months... I'm not trying to dampen the enthusiasm. Dividing into three parts is indeed a safe strategy, but the key question is how many people can truly wait it out? I agree with the concept of a safety fund, but most people didn't get liquidated because they simply didn't use high leverage.

View OriginalReply0

PoetryOnChain

· 01-07 06:47

1800 to 80,000? I need to verify this number, it feels too outrageous. To put it nicely, how many can really execute it properly? The mindset is the hardest part. I've tried splitting this into three parts before, but I'm always hesitant at the moment of stop-loss. The concept of saving your life funds is good, but most people simply can't save enough. I agree with waiting for opportunities, but waiting is too torturous. A 3% stop-loss sounds simple, but when the market crashes, your mindset instantly explodes. This logic is sound, but the key is discipline; without it, it's useless. Is 50,000 U genuine? Are there screenshots? The feeling of oscillating market friction is so real, a bloody lesson.

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 01-07 06:47

Sounds great, but the reality is that nine out of ten people lose. Rolling positions sounds impressive, but it's easy to go all-in in one shot. The mindset part is correct—no one can really do it. From 1800 to 80,000, the odds are not much different from winning the lottery. Waiting for the right opportunity is a good strategy, but most people can't wait three months.

View OriginalReply0

BtcDailyResearcher

· 01-07 06:43

Sounds like a story, but going from 1,800 to 80,000 in 3 months... Is it really reliable to just lay out the numbers? The data showing 1,800 turning into 80,000 is a bit exaggerated. Using 50x leverage? I don't really believe it. The part about controlling your mindset is well said, but most people can't do it. The key is waiting for the right opportunity, but I'm just worried that waiting might cause you to miss the entire market wave. A 3% stop-loss is actually just giving yourself a chance to survive; don't be reckless. Did that guy really never get liquidated? Or did he just not mention it? Splitting into three parts is a pretty old-school logic, but it can help you last a bit longer. Basically, greed will kill you; patience is what makes money. Is the 50,000 USD a real account or just a personal estimate... The details aren't clear. This logic makes sense, but execution is tough—99% of people won't make it through the first month.

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 01-07 06:35

1800 to 80,000? That number sounds a bit outrageous, but I admit the logic of position splitting is correct; the key is restraint. Waiting for a clear trend before taking action really hit me—I've been too frequent in my operations before, losing money very quickly. A 3% stop-loss is really hard to execute; I always want to wait a bit more... Rolling positions sounds satisfying, but what if I don't control a single trade well? Isn't this risk underestimated? The concept of a safety fund is good; it's definitely better than losing everything. From 1800 to 80,000 in three months... I feel like some details are being hidden. The real test is still the mindset; I understand the rules but when it comes to execution, I get nervous. Such cases are usually survivor bias; who else would share their failures? But splitting positions can indeed reduce single-trade risk; there's no escaping that.

View OriginalReply0