Wealth management is experiencing a subtle yet significant turning point. This change stems from a strategic adjustment by a top U.S. financial institution—starting January 5th, over 15,000 financial advisors across its private banking, Merrill, and other systems have gained new authority: they can proactively recommend Bitcoin spot ETF products to clients.



This may not sound groundbreaking, but the context is crucial. Previously, these advisors primarily played a "gatekeeper" role regarding crypto assets—responding only when asked and never initiating the conversation. Now, with the policy shift, Bitcoin ETFs have transitioned from "a special requirement exclusive to certain clients" to a "regular option within investment portfolios."

The official recommended allocation is 1% to 4% of the investment portfolio, tailored for investors who can tolerate high volatility and are optimistic about innovative directions. The investment management team explained straightforwardly: a moderate allocation of digital assets may help optimize the overall risk-return profile.

On the implementation side, this institution specifically chose Bitcoin spot ETFs as the only compliant channel, rather than directly holding Bitcoin. Their chief investment office has approved four ETF products with leading scale and liquidity. This approach avoids the complexities and risks of self-custody while providing clients with a relatively standardized investment method.

The significance of this shift may be greater than the numbers themselves—it indicates that traditional financial institutions' attitude toward crypto assets is evolving from "cautiously observing" to "conditionally accepting."
BTC-2.23%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ETHReserveBankvip
· 01-07 06:54
Wow, 15,000 financial advisors can be promoted now? This time it's really happening, no more hiding and sneaking around.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 01-07 06:49
Damn, 15,000 advisors can now promote? This really means it's time to get in... The previously strict threshold is now just being opened up like this, a bit exposed haha. The percentage from 1% to 4% is incredible; it looks cautious but is actually a form of approval—experts indeed. ETFs instead of holding coins directly, very safe. I like this cautious approach. Traditional finance making this turn, it feels like the big show has just begun—interesting. Wait, could this be the advisors starting to work hard? Watching clients' wallets tremble... Finally, this day has arrived; it should have been like this a long time ago. Institutions are really moving, retail investors should wake up, right?
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinHuntervip
· 01-07 06:44
Wow, 15,000 financial advisors are starting to push BTC spot ETFs? This is the real consensus, traditional finance has finally lowered its head and become more compliant. But 1-4% allocation... it's a bit conservative. I was never this cautious when I went all-in haha. This time is really different. With institutional support, it's just different. The bottom is probably in, right everyone? Wait, they chose ETFs instead of direct holdings? A bit timid, but indeed more stable... I guess I’m a gambler with my self-custody. Recognition from traditional finance ≈ formation of consensus ≈ the next hundredfold opportunity is coming? Pure speculation, but it feels like this time is really different. The Americans finally remember that BTC is not just a money laundering tool. Better late than never, right?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 01-07 06:42
Wait a minute, 15,000 advisors simultaneously authorized to push ETFs... According to on-chain data, we need to thoroughly analyze the fund flow behind this. Institutions suddenly changed their stance, from passive to actively promoting. This rapid shift clearly indicates that big players are布局ing. A 1% to 4% allocation ratio... Hmm, this number is very carefully designed. I need to track the fund movements of these ETF products. The so-called "compliance channels" are actually just different disguises; the funds still flow to those top-tier institutions. This turning point is too coincidental. I’ve long suspected that Wall Street would play this way. Suspicious wallet behaviors are increasing, and traditional finance can no longer hold back.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapistvip
· 01-07 06:32
Wow, 15,000 financial advisors can push Bitcoin overnight? How much reassurance does that give? Mainstream finance is really about to enter the scene.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 01-07 06:31
Whoa, 15,000 advisors directly pushing for BTC ETF? This is true institutional recognition, no longer something to hide or shy away from. --- A 1-4% allocation sounds conservative, but the real shock is the shift from "not daring to promote" to "actively promoting." --- Finally, no more arguing with client managers; it's pretty satisfying to go directly through the ETF. --- The goalkeeper turning into a salesperson—this signal is really much more impactful than the numbers themselves. --- Honestly, when traditional finance loosens up, what does that usually mean? --- I'm not surprised that Bitcoin spot ETFs are becoming standard; it's only a matter of time. --- Feels like the entire Wall Street is implicitly accepting crypto legalization, except for the US government not making an official statement yet. --- Starting from 1% and daring to promote it shows they’ve already calculated the yields internally. --- This is probably a sign that big institutions are collectively jumping in; how far are other players behind? --- ETFs are indeed more stable than directly holding coins, saving a lot of hassle.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)