Rayls Labs may seem like a public chain project at first glance, but many people have misconceptions about it. Some think it is constrained by the ERC standards, but this is a misunderstanding.



Just like some good things are not immediately obvious on the surface, Rayls' true strength lies in the details of its underlying design. The ERC standard itself is a compatibility layer, not a restriction. On the contrary, by innovating within the standard framework, Rayls has achieved greater ecosystem adaptability and cross-chain potential.

Many blockchain projects focus on standard issues, but Rayls' approach is smarter — fully leveraging the advantages of existing standards and exploring its own differentiated capabilities on that basis. This is true technical wisdom. If you're interested, you can delve into its technical white paper; there are indeed valuable details inside.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockwatcher9000vip
· 11h ago
Bro, this way of saying things sounds a bit cliché. Every project claims to be undervalued, there are details to look into, and the white paper needs to be studied thoroughly... Truly, validation depends on user retention and ecosystem enthusiasm.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFillervip
· 01-07 12:57
Another project hyped up to the sky, I've heard this kind of pitch way too many times. Wait, let's wait and see the white paper first, but honestly, I've always been a bit skeptical about claims of innovation within the standard framework. Ecological adaptability is indeed tempting, but there are too many lessons from past cross-chain attempts. Is there something in the details? I remember someone else also hyped up their details like this... and then what happened? It's somewhat interesting, at least the idea isn't so cliché. Here's my observation checklist. Isn't the standard a constraint? That statement can also be valid when reversed, depending on how you use it. Whether ERC compatibility is truly impressive depends on execution, not just what’s written in the paper. But this perspective is quite fresh; it feels like playing dimensionality reduction attacks.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWangvip
· 01-07 07:50
Oh damn, finally someone explained it clearly. The group behind the ERC standards really misunderstood it. It's not about restrictions; it's about fundamentals. Being able to innovate within this framework is true skill.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfervip
· 01-07 07:42
Oh, it took me a while to realize that the ERC standard isn't a constraint; this way of thinking is indeed wild. I need to find time to go through the white paper; detail-oriented folks are very curious. Projects that can play around within the framework are still somewhat interesting.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefathervip
· 01-07 07:37
Haha, here comes the Rayls hype again. The ERC standard is a compatibility layer, not a restriction. I've heard this theory many times. To be honest, details determine success or failure, but the premise is that you have to live until the day you can perfect the details. Many chains are built up this way... A well-written white paper doesn't necessarily mean it can be implemented. Let's wait until the mainnet launches to see.
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfervip
· 01-07 07:30
My buddy is right, innovating within the framework is definitely smarter than blindly messing around. Damn, a bunch of people are still tangled up in standards. I understand Rayls' move. The white paper needs to be read when I have time; the details are indeed meticulous.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)