A recent project on a low-Gas blockchain has attracted attention. Its core logic is to encourage spontaneous dissemination through economic incentives. Mechanism-wise, each transaction incurs a 3% fee, part of which is used for automatic buybacks, and the rest is directly airdropped to token holder addresses. The benefits of this approach are obvious— the more active the transactions, the higher the airdrop frequency, and the stronger the motivation for participants to profit.



What’s interesting is that this design inherently has a deflationary property. Airdrops to zombie addresses are burned, and circulating tokens are continuously decreasing. As the number of token holder addresses increases, the overall ecosystem activity also rises. Data shows that related addresses are growing rapidly, aiming for higher levels.

Rather than calling it a certain token project, it’s more like an experiment based on on-chain economics. In a bear market environment, it demonstrates an alternative survival logic— not relying on external hype or marketing, but on mechanism design to motivate participants self-sufficiently. Whether this model can operate long-term depends on the community’s ability to sustain participation and maintain consensus.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 6h ago
Wow, this self-motivation logic gameplay is really something, let's see how long it can last.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollectorvip
· 01-07 07:58
It's the same self-motivation routine again, but this time the data is really trending... Pretty interesting. --- 3% transaction fee buyback + airdrop, sounds like a rug pull, but I respect the deflationary logic. --- Even in a bear market, relying on mechanisms to hype yourself up is much more honest than projects that just shout signals every day. --- Address growth is rapid... but we need to see actual activity; how to filter out zombie addresses? --- Basically, it's an economic experiment; whether it succeeds or not depends on human nature. --- On-chain with low gas costs makes trial and error inexpensive. I want to see how long it can sustain. --- No hype, no blackening; this kind of self-motivated design is indeed more interesting than traditional tokens. --- Wait, are the zombie address airdrops being destroyed? Isn't that a form of indirect destruction? Will it really lead to long-term deflation? --- I just want to know if active trading is really driven by incentives or just speculation. --- At least they are seriously working on the mechanism, unlike some projects that just do marketing.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 01-07 07:56
ngl this smells like a ponzi wrapped in elegant tokenomics... that 3% fee structure always gets me. been there, lost that with similar "self-sustaining" mechanics back in '22. the deflationary narrative looks good on paper til liquidity dries up suddenly. watch those collateral ratios on this one fr fr
Reply0
FlashLoanLordvip
· 01-07 07:45
It's the same old routine of automatic buyback + airdrop, has it just been a rebrand this time? --- Wait, deflation + address growth... this logic actually has some substance. --- Even in a bear market, they can still come up with new tricks, impressive. Just worried that more people will get burned later. --- A 3% fee doesn't sound like much, but the real test is how long the community can sustain it. --- This self-motivation approach... in my opinion, it's all about who is willing to take the last risk. --- There are plenty of experiments like this on low-gas chains, but few actually survive. --- Good-looking mechanisms are nice, but the key is still whether people keep buying and selling. --- Deflationary properties sound great, but can we trust the burn data from zombie addresses? --- After designing such a complicated system, it's better to just tell me how to get in now. --- Another project claiming "not relying on marketing, just mechanisms," but in the end, it's still the community hyping itself up.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 01-07 07:42
It's that kind of self-motivation trick again. Outwardly, it's an on-chain economics experiment; inwardly, it's just a game of hot potato with a new twist. I've seen too many projects like this. Early participants can indeed reap benefits, but don't forget the other side of deflation—the rising scarcity of tokens means the cost for new entrants is increasing. Wait, the airdrop from zombie addresses being burned? That logic doesn't quite add up. There are countless ways to self-rescue during a bear market, as long as you don't cut the leeks. A 3% fee seems mild, but with frequent trading, it adds up. The real profits still go to those who laid out early. Honestly, maintaining community consensus is the key to survival; if no one takes the bait, everything remains just talk on paper. This mechanism design is somewhat interesting, but I'm more concerned about when liquidity will break.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCriticvip
· 01-07 07:34
The 3% fee distribution ratio seems a bit uncertain. What is the specific allocation between buybacks and airdrops? I haven't seen the details.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)