Many blockchain applications are actually exploring different paths—some focus on user interaction experience, some are developing membership rights models, and others are experimenting with product traceability. It seems lively, but these directions are not addressing the same problem.



The issue is that many projects didn't clearly define their core needs from the start. When the problem itself is vague, even the most advanced technical methods can't produce meaningful results. Technology is just a tool; the key is to first figure out what you need to solve. Otherwise, piling up more solutions is just a waste of effort.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PonziDetectorvip
· 01-07 07:59
Isn't this just throwing money in to find problems? A classic case of putting the cart before the horse. Really, I've seen too many projects running around with a bunch of technical solutions. They haven't even clarified the core requirements, how can they succeed? Oh my God, it's another bunch of projects messing around aimlessly. No matter how fancy the tech stack is, it can't save vague requirements. Having ideas without practical problem awareness is no wonder everything is a mess. Basically, it's pseudo-requirements disguised as essentials. These teams haven't even figured out what they're doing. If the problem isn't clear, no matter how good the solution is, it's all nonsense. Tired of these excuses, think things through carefully before going on the chain, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 01-07 07:59
That's really not wrong. I've seen too many projects that throw around their tech stacks wildly, not knowing what they're actually doing. To put it simply, it's just a pile of pseudo-requirements, falsely claiming to be innovation. This is the real problem; technology is just a cover.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxietyvip
· 01-07 07:57
That's right, which is why so many projects ultimately fail. A bunch of directions flying chaotically, not even knowing what they're doing. The problem has become vague; no matter how advanced the technology is, it can't save them. Really, think carefully before jumping in, don't follow the crowd blindly. Most projects are just for the sake of blockchain itself. This calm analysis is rare, thumbs up.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluffvip
· 01-07 07:52
You're right, a bunch of projects are flying around aimlessly like headless flies. There are very few who truly understand the problem. They want both users and traceability, but are multitasking here. Let's first clarify the requirements before talking about technology stacks, instead of just messing around with them.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 01-07 07:51
This is a typical case of looking for nails with a hammer. Prioritizing technology first is useless. In my opinion, nine out of ten projects fail over the question "What do we use blockchain for?" Traceability, rights, interaction... they all sound good, but have they truly addressed users' pain points? Not thought through clearly. If the problem isn't well defined, no matter how fancy the solution is, it's just a facade. Too many people in this industry blindly trust technology, resulting in everyone doing their own thing, looking down on each other, and none of them making progress. Core needs, brother, this is the starting point, not the end.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustlervip
· 01-07 07:44
A fart, I haven't even figured out the requirements yet and you're already laying out the groundwork.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)