Many beginners enter the market with contracts, and their first reaction is to turn on full position mode. The reasoning sounds smooth: it can withstand fluctuations and is less likely to be wiped out by orders. But this is actually a big misconception. Full position is never a "casual add-on" shield; using it incorrectly can lead to faster ruin.



The real purpose of full position is simply to leave more room for maneuver in your account, not to mean you can pile all your funds into a single trade.

I've seen too many people make this mistake. An account with only a few thousand yuan dares to use ninety percent of its funds for a short-term trade, comforting itself that this is more stable. But what happens? Slight market reversals can instantly wipe out the margin, trigger forced liquidation, and the account can go to zero immediately—without even a chance for manual intervention.

Why do some people survive with the same leverage while others are wiped out? The answer is painfully simple: it’s not about how accurate your market prediction is, but whether you’ve calculated your position size in advance.

Some people notice the wrong direction early, reduce their position to stop losses, and keep losses within a tolerable range. Others, holding onto the hope of "it will come back if I wait," stubbornly endure, only to have their funds completely swallowed. The difference isn’t huge, but the outcomes are worlds apart.

Here’s a real-world example. Suppose your account has only 1,000 yuan, and you use only 100 yuan to open a high-leverage position. Even if your judgment is completely wrong, you still have 900 yuan of buffer, and your account can continue to operate without issue. But if you directly commit 800 yuan or more— even if the leverage isn’t extremely high—a normal market fluctuation can easily cause your entire account to spiral out of control.

Leverage is essentially an amplifier; it magnifies your gains and, proportionally, your losses. What truly determines life or death is never how high the leverage is, but how much principal you are risking on that single trade.

So stop obsessing over the false question of "how many times leverage is safe." First, ask yourself three practical questions: what percentage of my total account funds does this trade occupy, where exactly is my stop-loss level, and if the market moves completely against me, can I accept this loss?

Answering these three questions clearly is more effective than any trading technique. Full position mode itself isn’t a safety net; the real safety net is strict position management and trading discipline. Staying alive is always more important than anything else.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshivip
· 01-07 14:39
Really, I've seen too many people get wiped out by full positions, thinking they can withstand volatility, only to go broke directly. That's right, position management is the lifeline; leverage multiples are not the main point at all. Newbies should really take a good look at this, stop dreaming, and avoid overconfidence that can be very harmful. The heartbreaking part is that most people haven't even calculated how much they are risking per trade, and they just go all in. I've heard a saying: surviving is the key to making money, and this is more valuable than any skill. I just want to know how many people can truly stick to 10% position size; most probably can't resist the urge to add more. Wait a bit longer, and it will come back. I've heard this reason too many times, all at the cost of blood.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobovip
· 01-07 08:51
Really, this is a painful lesson. I've seen too many people whose position management is a mess and end up losing everything. Ultimately, it's a discipline issue; those who don't cut losses end up with no good outcome. Going all-in and then wanting to add more? That's hilarious, this logic is just ridiculous. What this article says hits too close to home; all the retail investors I know have fallen into this trap. Position management is truly the top priority; technical skills are secondary. Every time I hear people talk about leverage multiples, but they never consider the position size ratio. No wonder they die quickly.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 01-07 08:48
It's the same old story again; how many newcomers are going to stumble here.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroupvip
· 01-07 08:39
You're so right. I've seen too many people fall for this; going all-in is just a trap. Before their account hits zero, they think they're very stable, but a single reverse wave can directly lead to game over. Position management is truly a huge deal; it's more valuable than any technical indicator. People with a good mindset would have already cut their positions and run away, while the greedy ones are still waiting for a comeback, only to end up losing everything. That's why nine out of ten people lose money on contracts; those who survive are always the ones who keep their accounts clear and calculated.
View OriginalReply0
BagHolderTillRetirevip
· 01-07 08:23
Ah... another painful lesson, so many people get caught in the full-position trap and lose everything. If I had known this truth earlier, I wouldn't have been so badly trapped. It was just one wave of correction that wiped me out completely, with no time to react. Now, every time I see beginners talking about going all-in, I just want to laugh. Position management is truly more important than anything else, but unfortunately, it's often too late to realize it. Stop-loss is easy to say but really hard to do, especially when you see unrealized losses and your mindset...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)