Recently, there is a phenomenon in the market worth noting—an account holding 14.6 million Pippin collected $6 million in funding fees over 22 days. This time span extended from mid-December to early January, appearing to establish a long position at a low point.



The interesting part is: even if the contract price didn't rise, just earning funding fees alone brought in $6 million. This is somewhat counterintuitive for retail investors—most are still pondering how to get rich overnight through price fluctuations, while overlooking a more stable income source.

A comparison makes it clear. Many large traders would find it difficult to earn this amount in 22 days. But what if we change the perspective? Establish a long position at the bottom of a specific coin, then hold the position and wait—over a few months, not only is there potential for contract gains, but the funding fees themselves continuously flow into the account.

This actually reveals another profitable dimension of the market: you don't necessarily have to rely on directional judgment to make quick money. Sometimes, capturing low points and leveraging the time value of funding fees can be the strategy that wins in the end.
PIPPIN-8.33%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SquidTeachervip
· 01-07 08:54
Market manipulation through funding fees to trap retail investors—I've seen through this trick a long time ago. --- Wow, 6 million in 22 days? Think from another angle—who's footing the bill behind this? --- It's hard to hold on; once again, that "stable returns" rhetoric—sounds convincing but it's all a lie. --- Using low-position funding fees is indeed a clever move, but you need enough capital to back it up. --- I just want to know—are these accounts run by institutions or some big players? Only non-ordinary people can invest so much money. --- Funding fee profits are severely underestimated, but most retail investors don't have the stamina to hold until the profit period. --- Another story of "ignoring price and only considering time cost"—sounds easy but actually risky to implement. --- The key question is, if you use 14.6 million to build a position at the bottom, what's the probability of losing money? Only true experts aren't afraid of that. --- This is called an information gap—people have already discovered the trick long ago, but it's only now being seen as something new. It's too late. --- Those who treat this as a long-term strategy will probably be worn out alive; how strong must their mental resilience be?
View OriginalReply0
ContractHuntervip
· 01-07 08:51
Wow, 6 million in 22 days just for funding fees? This is real passive income, way more exciting than us retail investors constantly watching the charts.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollectorvip
· 01-07 08:51
Wow, the funding fee has earned 6 million? This is true passive income, much smarter than me chasing gains and losses every day.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorkervip
· 01-07 08:48
Wow, 6 million in 22 days? This guy really has a deep understanding of the funds. We're still betting on the direction, and he's already settled down and started charging fees.
View OriginalReply0
MechanicalMartelvip
· 01-07 08:45
Wow, so this is how big players operate. The capital fee harvesting machine really exists.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugeevip
· 01-07 08:33
Wow, this idea is brilliant. A capital fee harvesting machine, no need to gamble on the direction at all.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)