2026-01-19 19:25:55

Crypto maximalism is basically done for. Going all-in on digital assets alone? That's a recipe for missing opportunities and lagging behind. The playbook for 2026 has shifted—think bigger. A 360-degree approach works better now: keep tabs on precious metals, traditional equities, and crypto simultaneously. Bitcoin's still got serious runway, potentially hitting $1 million, but here's the thing: it's transitioning into just another asset class in your portfolio. The wild-card days are fading. Smart money isn't betting everything on one narrative anymore.

BTC-0.14%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ImpermanentSage

· 7h ago

It sounds quite reasonable, but has maximalism really died... It seems like some people are still stubbornly sticking to it.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 7h ago

According to the logical framework of the white paper, this article actually makes a fundamental mistake—confusing asset allocation strategies with narrative decline. From the perspective of Token economics, the scarcity of Bitcoin as a native asset remains unchanged; only the market participants' game-theoretic equilibrium is shifting. This does not mean that the "wild growth period has ended." It is worth noting that the voting data from multi-chain governance proposals repeatedly confirm: the real smart money is precisely deepening its strategies as a crypto native, rather than fleeing.

View OriginalReply0

blocksnark

· 7h ago

Pure crypto is dead, but a million dollars in Bitcoin is still possible... The question is, who still dares to go all-in now?

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 7h ago

Uh... the idea that maximalism is dead is a bit absolute, I've been tired of that argument for a long time.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSunriser

· 7h ago

Nah, it's just a compromise. The nice way to say it is "diversified allocation," but in reality, it's just saving face for traditional finance.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 7h ago

To be honest, those who still stick to a single asset are just gambling. Diversified allocation is indeed more stable, but I still believe Bitcoin's potential won't fade so quickly.

View OriginalReply0