2026-01-19 20:26:55

Facial verification sounds secure on paper, but it's surprisingly vulnerable in practice. The gap between security theory and real-world implementation exposes some uncomfortable truths. How many platforms have actually tested whether their facial recognition systems can be defeated? It's worth asking—especially as more Web3 services rely on biometric verification for account security. What are the actual vulnerability rates we're seeing out there?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasGrillMaster

· 8h ago

Oh boy, another set of theories that are perfect in theory but fail in reality... Web3 really dares to implement face verification, but has anyone thought about how this can be fooled with photo editing?

View OriginalReply0

PhantomHunter

· 8h ago

Surface-level security can never fool people; when it comes to actual combat, the true nature is revealed.

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusBot

· 8h ago

Speaking of this, someone has already stepped on the landmine long ago. The facial recognition security measures are extremely fragile, and the security on paper is just a joke.

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 8h ago

ngl this is the biggest challenge in Web3 security. Everything looks perfect on paper, but in reality, there are countless bugs. How many platforms are willing to openly disclose how many times their facial recognition has been hacked...

View OriginalReply0

ProposalDetective

· 8h ago

Well... I've long wanted to complain about whether facial recognition is effective or not; it just feels like armchair strategy.

View OriginalReply0